Tag: realestate

By the Numbers

Last week, it seemed, the big news in the real estate/mortgage world was that conforming loan limits were increased for 2019. Without a doubt, that is interesting and tells us that, among other things, the housing market continues to strengthen and our economy continues to improve.  I’ll pause here for you to do the happy dance.

Depending on your part of the country or your market in which you specialize, you may be dealing regularly with homes that require a mortgage a little shy of $500K so the conforming loan limit being raised is a huge deal.  However, if you are working with homes regularly and decidedly south of that price point, this could be like trying to make a big deal to people living in Tucson, Arizona that the cost of down-filled parkas has significantly dropped.

Let me put up three statistics I recently came across that, I believe, will have more universal significance:

Stat #1:  According to the US Census Bureau, 30.3% of homes owned in our nation have absolutely no mortgage on them – they’re owned free and clear.

Stat #2:  According to a new report from ATTOM Data Solutions, dated November 8, 2018, 14.5 million homes are “equity rich.”  In plain English, that means that 14.5 million homes here in the United States that have mortgages on them have AT LEAST 50% equity in them!  That number represents 25.7% of the homes in the United States.

Stat #3:  According to the same ATTOM report, only 8.8% of homes in the United States are “under water” (the value of the home is 25% less than what is owed on the home) as of the end of the third quarter of this year.  The previous quarter of this year, the number was 9.3%. That drop from 9.3% to 8.8% represents over 200,000 homes in just one quarter!

These three statistics can be boiled down to this: if you took 100 homes in a neighborhood to target through door knocking, direct mail, or some other way of looking for new clients, less than nine of those homeowners will be under water and probably not a good candidate.  Conversely, though, 56 of those homeowners (30.3% who have no mortgage, thus a boatload of equity, and 25.7% who have 50% of more in equity) will be prime candidates to approach about buying an income property or a vacation home using the equity in their primary home to finance the down payment.  The few agents I know who use this data as I’ve described it have significantly increased their production.  In fact, most of them began with just their past clients and built on their success quickly from that simple starting point.  That makes a lot more sense (and money) than beating the drum about conforming loan limits, right?

The Value of Expertise

A corporation was refitting a building for a new production facility, and they needed to know where to drill a hole in the floor to install something and avoid damaging existing piping and wiring. They called a local engineer who came out, spent about twenty minutes making some measurements, marked the spot where the hole should be drilled, packed up his things, and left the premises. A short time later, the engineer sent an invoice for his services to the corporate accounts payable department: the invoice was for $1,000.  The CEO, in order to contain construction costs on this production facility, had instituted a policy that any invoices over a certain dollar amount were to be sent directly to him for his approval.  The engineer’s invoice was over that threshold.

Upon receipt of the engineer’s invoice, the CEO was livid.  He had been out at the production facility the day the engineer performed his services, and he remembered that the engineer didn’t spend that much time on his task.  So, the CEO took the invoice and wrote a note that read, “You spent twenty minutes at my facility, and all you did was mark an ‘X’ on our floor.  I’m not paying you $1,000 for twenty minutes of work.” Pleased with himself, he instructed the invoice be mailed back to the engineer posthaste (that’s what CEOs say when they want something done quickly, right).

A few days later, the CEO found an envelope sitting in his inbox that was addressed directly to him.  He opened the envelope and found the invoice from the engineer with a hand-written note scribbled at the bottom that read, “I’ve spent over twenty YEARS in my specialty to know EXACTLY where to mark that ‘X’ on your floor.  Kindly remit $1,000.”  Knowing the engineer was right, the CEO immediately approved the invoice and sent it on to accounts payable.

With the internet and especially YouTube, we’ve become a DIY people who like to fix things ourselves, and that’s admirable. However, there are still certain things we reserve for the experts in particular fields to do for us – I haven’t heard of someone with an eighth-grade education trying to perform an appendectomy on himself by watching a video, but I could be wrong (but I REALLY hope I’m not).

One of the fields in which I would highly recommend you get the RIGHT expert is credit repair for a mortgage.  I would NOT recommend a credit repair service; this isn’t because they are shady or underhanded – the vast majority are completely above board – but because they aren’t designed to get you where you need to be.  Their business model is simple: a person in need of help pays an up-front fee for some counseling and advice – all legitimate.  Whether the person they’re helping follows their advice or not, they’ve been paid: the service’s goal has been met.  When people need to repair their credit to qualify for a mortgage, the RIGHT expert to help them is us, the mortgage company.

We don’t charge a fee (no mortgage company should), and we give the borrower more attention and better advice than any other service or agency.  The reason is simple: we have a vested interest to help them repair their credit as quickly as possible so they can qualify for that mortgage – and that’s how we get paid.  At the end of it all, the client gets repaired credit and a home, and the real estate agent gets buyers who are ready to buy at that moment.  It doesn’t take an expert to see the wisdom in that, right?

Deal Killer: the Unknown

Let me tell you a little story.  The subject of this story was a college athlete.  Specifically, he was a swimmer, and a darn good one at that.  He and his relay team had won a lot of competitions and accolades, and they made it all the way to the Olympic trials . . .  only to miss making the summer games by .07 seconds.  A sneeze lasts longer than that.

Because of his unique set of skills, he has been hired by the United States government to train Navy SEALs in endurance swimming.  Most of his training takes place in San Diego where the Pacific waters are rather chilly.

Unlike some of the PE coaches I had back in high school who “trained” me in physical fitness but hadn’t run or done anything physical since the Nixon administration, this SEAL trainer does everything he requires of his students.  When they swim five miles in the open ocean, he swims five miles with them.  When they swim at night, he swims with them.  And each time he does this, he beats them.  (I mean he reaches the end of the swim before they do; he doesn’t take a large stick and start whacking them with it.)

The average age of someone going through the SEAL training is early/mid 20s.  Our intrepid instructor is 51 years old.  (You didn’t see that one coming, did you?) Recently, someone asked him how he’ll know when it’s time to throw in the towel (or wrap up in a towel and stay on the beach), and his answer was simple and succinct: “when one of them beats me.”  He went on to explain that there’s one major factor he has playing in his favor that gives him an edge over  these “boys” who weren’t even born when he was vying for a spot in the Olympics: the unknown.

When they start their five-, seven-, or ten-mile swim, he knows all the checkpoints and markers that tell him how far he’s gone and how far he has to go; the students have no idea.  Further, the unknown plays into the students’ heads.  Are there sharks out there?  When do they get to eat next?  When will they be able to take a rest?  Our instructor doesn’t have any of these questions bouncing around in his head; he can focus solely on the task at hand.

We, as real estate and mortgage professionals, are very similar to this instructor (or we should be): we know the checkpoints and the markers.  The difference, of course, is that we’re not training Navy SEALs; we’re helping people realize their dreams, build their portfolios, and giving them peace of mind. This means we should let absolutely nothing unknown linger in our clients’ heads.  If it means taking an extra five minutes to ask and answer a few more questions to assure our clients are fully apprised of what’s next and what’s coming up, they won’t lose their energy or resolve before we get them to the finish line.

Calm Before the Storm

In light of recent events, I was really going back and forth on whether I should use this title for this week’s edition of Priority Pulse, but I believe once you’ve read it, you’ll agree the title is fitting.  Are we good?

Recently, an agent came to me with a very young borrower who wanted to buy a new house.  Before I could ask the usual questions about income, credit, etc., the agent told me that they had tried another lender who told them she couldn’t qualify the borrower for the amount needed to purchase the house based solely on his income.  We quickly determined that he regularly works overtime, and he gets quite a good amount of it each week, but he’s only been at his current employer for 14 months; his previous employer didn’t give him any overtime.  We need two years of employment during which the borrower receives overtime to be able to count it, right?  (That’s where the first lender stopped.)  Actually, that’s not the way the FHA rule is written regarding overtime –it actually leaves it up to the underwriter to determine if overtime can be counted.

When I called the agent back to let her know I was reasonably confident we could qualify her client to purchase the house without having to add another borrower to the mix, she was ready (and I definitely applaud this) to write the offer at that very moment.  Fortunately, though, I was able to keep her on the line and explain the matter regarding overtime.  Further, I recommended that before writing an offer, we should submit a full file to the underwriter for approval.  This way, if we get the approval, we’re aces; if the overtime is the sticking point, we can still work on finding ways to get it approved or adding another borrower without the clock ticking on a contract.  She agreed.

A few days later, I had the privilege of calling the agent back and letting her know she was now able –nay, expected –to do the happy dance: the underwriter, in her discretion, counted the overtime so the borrower has more than enough income to qualify, and the agent needs to do her thing.  Even though the days between when I first explained the strategy to the agent and when I had her release the hounds and get the house were filled with text messages with funny images displaying her desire for everything to happen yesterday, we maintained a calm –a calm that could be maintained because we knew that whatever came out of our submission to the underwriter, we still had options, and we hadn’t put ourselves against the clock.  Further, we brought the agent into our “war room” meeting so she didn’t see any need to put us up against the clock either.  A storm is now being unleashed: a storm of excitement for a very young man to buy his first home: the American Dream!  Come on, if you’re not hearing patriotic music in your head or shedding a small tear of happiness for this guy, I don’t know who you are!

Tomorrow (Tuesday, November 6th) will be the culmination of a lot of building uncertainty for us all, regardless of our political stripe, but it will also be the beginning of new uncertainties.  Today is the calm before the storm.  Whether the results of tomorrow cause hyperventilation from panic or excitement, please remember the words of Paul Harvey: “In times like these, it helps to recall that there have always been times like these.”

Flooded with Knowledge

This week’s topic is taken from an experience one of our newer loan originators recently had, and I thought it might be useful to some of you.  Many of you will probably say, “I already knew all that,” but I’m hoping that some of you will walk away feeling enlightened and educated.  (Some may say that last sentence is my passive-aggressive challenge to get everyone to read this article to the very end.  No comment.)

So, here’s the deal: after the borrowers were approved, made their offer, and the house went under contract, the underwriter came back to us and indicated that the home was in a flood plain so flood insurance was required.  Here’s the reason I mentioned that the loan originator was of the less-than-veteran status: when qualifying the borrowers, he did not take the possibility of a flood insurance requirement into account so the debt-to-income ratios were dangerously close to being out of whack.  Someone sneezing on the loan application or looking at it wrong could have sent it over the edge.  When he was discussing this with some of the other loan originators in the office, each one sort of smiled and told him that the area in which this house was located almost always required flood insurance.  Lesson learned by the rookie.

When the flood insurance requirement was mentioned to the seller’s agent, she acted like the deal was dead by making a comment that it would be next to impossible for the borrowers to get a flood insurance policy both in a timely manner and at an affordable price.  The loan originator had already done his homework and informed the seller’s agent that the existing policy held by the current home owners could be transferred to the new buyers.  She laughed and said that she’d been selling homes in that area for over twenty years, and she knew that wasn’t possible.  Our loan originator wasn’t deterred, and he called the buyers’ agent to give him an update on the loan’s progress.

The buyers’ agent and our loan originator, after discussing all of this, agreed that it was odd that the listing agent would act this way.  If she KNEW that getting flood insurance was difficult and expensive in an area KNOWN for requiring flood insurance, wouldn’t it be in her best interest to address that elephant in the room at the very beginning?  Sure, it might turn off some buyers, but if she’s so confident in her knowledge of the area and what it required, she wouldn’t have to waste here time going under contract and waiting for the underwriter to be the bearer of bad tidings.

The existing flood insurance policy WAS transferable to the buyers at the same premium rate that the sellers were paying per month, so everyone lived happily ever after.  It was an educational experience all around: (1) the rookie loan originator learned to research the area better to anticipate costs; (2) the sellers’ agent learned that flood insurance was transferable, which kept it affordable; and (3) YOU learned that whenever a client of yours buys a house in a flood plain, they should keep the flood insurance current at all times because when they go to sell, that home is more attractive to buyers because the flood policy can be transferred at the same premium rate.  If you already knew #3, good on you.  If you didn’t, though, I’m glad you made it to the end.  Have a great week!

Contact Priority Lending

Priority Lending, LLC

8035 N Oracle Rd
Tucson, AZ 85704

520-531-1119

Call Today for Your Free Consultation!

Get Pre-Approved Online

Priority Lending LLC Small what logo for footer and header

Copyright © - www.PriorityLending.com
Website by CS Design Studios

NMLS 142706 | BK 0910846
Equal Housing Lender